Evidence Hub

Dose Escalation for Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Long-Term Update on the Outcomes of a Phase III, Single Institution Randomized Clinical Trial

D. Pasalic, D. Kuban, P. Allen, Chad Tang, S. Mesko, Stephen R. Grant, A. Augustyn, S. Frank et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2019

88 citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine the long-term outcomes for prostate adenocarcinoma when escalating radiation dose from 70 Gy to 78 Gy. Methods: Between 1993 and 1998, 301 patients with biopsy-proven clinical stage T1b – T3 prostate adenocarcinoma, any prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and any Gleason score were randomized to 70 Gy in 35 fractions vs. 78 Gy in 39 fractions photon radiation therapy using a four-field box technique without hormone deprivation therapy. The primary outcome was powered to detect a 15% difference in biochemical and/or clinical failure. Secondary outcomes included survival, prostate cancer mortality, biochemical failure, local failure, nodal failure, distant failure, and secondary malignancy rates. Results: With a median follow-up of 14.3 years, the cumulative incidence of 15-year biochemical and/or clinical failure was 18.9% vs. 12.0% in the 70-Gy vs. 78-Gy arm, respectively (sHR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38 – 0.98; Fine-Gray P=0.042). The 15-year cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was 3.4% vs. 1.1%, respectively (sHR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 – 0.82; Fine-Gray P=0.018). The 15-year cumulative incidence of prostate cancer-specific mortality was 6.2% vs. 3.2%, respectively (sHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27 – 0.98; Fine-Gray P=0.045). There were no differences in overall survival (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84–1.45; Log Rank P=0.469) or other-cause survival (sHR 1.33, 95% CI 0.99 – 1.79; Fine-Gray P=0.061). Salvage therapy was more common in the 70-Gy arm at 38.7% vs. 21.9% in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free