Evidence Hub

Effect of Paracetamol on Cerebral Temperature in Febrile Brain-Injured Patients. The NEUROTHERM Study: A Randomized Controlled Pharmacodynamic Trial

de Mesmay M, Geral L, Gregoire C, Roy M, Welschbillig S, Le Cossec C, Engrand N

Critical care medicine, 2026

99 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hyperthermia is common in brain-injured patients and is considered a systemic secondary brain injury. Paracetamol is most often administered as first-line treatment, although its efficacy in controlling cerebral temperature (CT) has never been evaluated, which is the aim of this study.

DESIGN

Pharmacodynamic prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Neuro-ICU.

PATIENTS

Brain-injured patients who were febrile (CT ≥ 38.5°C for > 30 min) and monitored with an intracerebral pressure sensor including a thermal probe.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received paracetamol or placebo (only one IV administration). CT and systemic temperature (ST) were recorded every 10 minutes over 6 hours.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary endpoint was the difference in mean CT over 6 hours after treatment. The primary endpoint was the difference in mean CT over6 hours after treatment. We included 99 patients (mean age 55 ± 13 yr, 24% female): 49 in the paracetamol group and 50 in the placebo group. Mean CT during the 6-hour follow-up was significantly lower in the paracetamol than placebo group: 38.4 ± 0.5 vs. 39.0 ± 0.5°C (p < 0.001). In both groups, mean CT was always higher than mean ST: 38.7 ± 0.6 vs. 38.4 ± 0.6°C (p < 0.001). Median time with CT less than 38.5°C was 215 minutes (interquartile range 0-290) in the paracetamol group vs. 0 minutes (0-5) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). One-third (30%) of patients in the paracetamol group did not respond to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 99 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free