Evidence Hub

Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium: a systematic review of environmental monitoring methods and analytical advances

Spinazzè A, Borghi F, Zellino C, Prina V, Cattaneo A, Recchia S, Dossi C, Della Notte S et al.

Annals of work exposures and health, 2026

Abstract

Background: Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) is a well-established occupational carcinogen, widely utilized in industrial processes such as electroplating, surface treatment, and ferrochromium production. It is also generated as a by-product of welding activities. Accurate monitoring of occupational exposure to Cr(VI) is essential for protecting workers' health. This review aims to critically assess the main challenges associated with existing environmental monitoring techniques for Cr(VI) in welding operations and to propose practical strategies to address these limitations.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted by consulting 3 scientific databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed). Studies assessing occupational exposure to Cr(VI) published since 2014, were included and analyzed in terms of methods, dosimetric parameters measures, and possible alternative approaches for Cr(VI) characterization.

Results: The reviewed studies employed diverse environmental monitoring strategies for occupational Cr(VI) exposure assessment, with substantial heterogeneity in sampling conventions, analytical workflows, and speciation capability. Some studies additionally reported biological measurements and/or used exposure modeling as supportive approaches; however, these were not systematically reviewed as primary endpoints. Findings confirm that occupational exposure to Cr(VI) remains a concern in multiple industries, with exposure levels varying according to tasks, process…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free