Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review of Electrochemical Sensing Devices Based on Metal-organic Frameworks for the Identification of Tumor Biomarkers

Aiany Maria Queiroz Felix, K. L. M. Santos, S. Alves, Maria Danielly Lima de Oliveira, C. D. de Andrade

Mini-Reviews in Organic Chemistry, 2024

2 citations

Abstract

Electrochemical sensors have attracted enormous interest in recent decades

due to their relatively simple synthesis process, the possibility of modifications in their composition,

and their wide application in detecting analytes.

To achieve excellent performance, materials used in its construction must facilitate the

transfer of electrons and provide a large surface area and excellent electrocatalytic activity. Because

they are functional nanomaterials, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) meet the criteria for application

as a sensing material and can be used to build high-performance sensors for numerous applications.

They play a relevant role in the early diagnosis of various neoplasms and tumor processes,

thus providing better prognoses. Considering this universe, the present study focused on evaluating

the application of these nanomaterials in the recognition of tumor biomarkers.

A systematic review of scientific publications was performed using the following descriptors

"MOFs", "Metal-organic frameworks", "Biosensor", "Electrochemistry", and "Tumor Biomarker".

Herein, we analyze recent innovations of MOF-based biosensors applied to the detection

of tumor biomarkers, discussing how promising characteristics and properties of these materials

were harnessed in the development of biosensors to provide a new contribution to future studies

and the development of applied MOFs to electrochemical biosensing.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free