Evidence Hub

Eccentric cycling for chronic respiratory disease: Does helmet ventilation add value? A randomized controlled trial

Chao KY, Liu WL, Hsu HW, Chen HC, Lim AY, Wang JS

Chronic respiratory disease, 2025

15 participants

Abstract

BackgroundChronic respiratory diseases frequently cause a decrease in physical activity and lower exercise tolerance. Eccentric Cycling Training (ECT) offers a potential rehabilitation strategy. However, its effectiveness when combined with Helmet Ventilation (HV) is not fully established.MethodsThis nonblinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigated the effects of ECT with or without HV in individuals with chronic respiratory diseases. Participants were randomly assigned to the ECT, ECT-HV, or control group and underwent graded exercise testing. The ECT sessions spanned 9 weeks with gradually increasing intensity. The primary outcome was peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Secondary outcomes included functional tests and symptom scores.ResultsForty-four patients with chronic respiratory diseases were enrolled and divided among the ECT (n = 13), ECT-HV (n = 15), and control (n = 13) groups. After 9 weeks, significant improvements in the 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, energy expenditure index during the 6MWT, and timed up and go test were observed in both the ECT and ECT-HV groups compared to the control group. Reductions in initially high Borg leg fatigue were noted over time in these groups. VO2peak at follow-up was 17.6 ± 2.9 ml/min/kg in the control group, 17.2 ± 4.5 ml/min/kg in the ECT group, and 18.2 ± 3.9 ml/min/kg in the ECT-HV group, with no significant differences among groups. No significant differences in achieving the targeted exercise intensity were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free