Evidence Hub

Performance of a new real-time continuous glucose monitoring system: A multicenter pilot study

Zhou J, Zhang S, Li L, Wang Y, Lu W, Sheng C, Li Y, Bao Y et al.

Journal of diabetes investigation, 2018

63 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Aims/introduction: The present study aimed to investigate the performance of a new real-time continuous glucose monitoring system.

Materials and methods: Interstitial glucose levels were monitored for 7 days in 63 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes using the Medtrum A6 TouchCare® CGM System. Venous blood was collected on a randomized day of the wear period. Plasma glucose levels were measured as reference values.

Results: Among 1,678 paired sensor-reference values, 90.5% (95% confidence interval 89.1-91.9%) were within ±20%/20 mg/dL of the reference values, with a mean absolute relative difference of 9.1 ± 8.7% (95% CI: 8.9-9.2%). The percentages of paired sensor-reference values falling within zone A and B of the Clarke error grid analysis (EGA) and the type 1 diabetes consensus EGA were 99.1 and 99.8%. Continuous EGA showed that the percentages of accurate readings, benign errors, and erroneous readings were 89.9, 6.3 and 3.8%, respectively. Surveillance EGA showed that 90.6, 9.2, and 0.2% of sensor-reference values with no, slight and lower moderate risk, respectively. The mean absolute relative difference was 16.6, and 96.0% of the sensor values fell within zones A and B of the consensus EGA for hypoglycemia. More than 85% of sensor values were within ±20%/20 mg/dL of reference values, the mean absolute relative difference was 99.5% of the sensor values fell in zones A and B of the consensus EGA.

Conclusions: The Medtrum real-time continuous glucose monitoring…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 63 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free