Evidence Hub

Impact of acupressure combined with flexible pressure sensor manometry on anesthesia recovery in patients undergoing Bronchoalveolar lavage: a randomized controlled trial

Lan-Lan Li, Guang-Hong Xu, Yun-Li Huang, Zhentao Sun, Lijun Jia

BMC Anesthesiology, 2025

120 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Postoperative cough after bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is common and can delay recovery. We evaluated whether acupressure at Tiantu (CV22), Chize (LU5), and Taiyuan (LU9), quantified by a flexible pressure sensor, improves anesthesia recovery. This single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled adults undergoing BAL under general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive acupressure (Group A) or routine PACU care without acupressure (Group C). In Group A, each acupoint was pressed sequentially for 3 min (CV22 → LU5 → LU9) with pressure recorded by a flexible sensor. Primary outcomes were cough severity and frequency; secondary outcomes included PACU time, heart rate, and complications such as tachycardia, hypertension, and stress urinary incontinence. A total of 120 patients were analyzed (60 in each group). Peak acupressure pressures were 30.2 N for CV22, 35.1 N for LU5, and 25.3 N for LU9, each peaking at 2.0 s. Compared with controls, patients receiving acupressure had a significantly shorter PACU stay (mean difference − 16.0 min, 95% CI − 18.9 to − 13.2), lower cough frequency (− 1.06 times/min, 95% CI − 1.83 to − 0.30), and reduced heart rate (− 9.5 beats/min, 95% CI − 13.7 to − 5.4). The incidence of moderate cough (10.0% vs. 48.3%, RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09–0.46), severe cough (35.0% vs. 60.0%, RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39–0.87), tachycardia (8.3% vs. 26.7%, RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12–0.80), and stress urinary incontinence (6.7% vs. 23.3%, RR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 120 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free