Evidence Hub

Design and Evaluation of a Wearable-Sensor Intelligent Training System for Aerobic Gymnastics: Machine-Learning–Based Movement Assessment and Neuromuscular Effects in a Randomized Controlled Trial

Yuan-Fu Luo, Kai Zhang, Qingxue Li

Proceedings of the 2025 2nd International Conference on Sports Technology and Performance Analysis, 2025

9 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Aerobic gymnastics demands precise coordination of explosive jumps, rapid transitions and high-intensity aerobic movements. Conventional coach-centered training relies mainly on visual observation and therefore provides limited, non-quantitative feedback on force-related movement quality. Recent advances in wearable sensing and machine learning create opportunities for real-time, data-driven intelligent training systems, but rigorous evaluations combining both algorithmic performance and training outcomes remain scarce. Objective: This study designed a wearable-sensor intelligent training system integrating inertial measurement units (IMUs), a force plate and a machine-learning classifier for real-time movement assessment, and evaluated (1) the computational performance of the system and (2) its effects on force-related neuromuscular performance in competitive aerobic gymnastics athletes compared with three commonly used training approaches. Methods: Thirty-six competitive aerobic gymnastics athletes were randomly allocated to four groups (n = 9 each): conventional coach-centered technical training (CON), structured progressive technical training (P-I), high-intensity conditioning-oriented training (P-II) and a digitalized intelligent training program (DITP) implemented via the proposed system. All groups trained four times per week for 8 weeks (90 min per session) using the same RAMP-based warm-up. The intelligent system acquired synchronized IMU and force-plate…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 9 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free