Evidence Hub

Comparing the effect of short foot exercise and toe curl exercise on plantar pressure during single-leg standing in individuals with flatfoot: A randomized controlled trial

Misaki Suzuki, Hironobu Kuruma, Kunihiro Kato, Hiromu Kase, Hayato Fujimoto, Rento Nagashima

Clinical Biomechanics, 2025

34 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controlling flatfoot biomechanics is crucial in preventing lower limb musculoskeletal injuries. Short foot exercise (SFE) and toe curl exercise (TCE) are interventions for flatfoot; however, their effects on foot biomechanics remain inconsistent. We aimed to compare the impact of SFE and TCE on plantar pressure during single-leg standing (SLS) in individuals with flatfoot.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial recruited 34 participants with flatfoot (Foot Posture Index-6 > 7). Participants were randomly assigned to SFE or TCE groups and completed 8 weeks of exercise. Plantar pressure during SLS was assessed pre- and post-intervention using a plantar pressure sensor. The foot was divided into eight regions: heel, midfoot, medial, central, lateral metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ), hallux, second toe, and 3rd-5th toes. Peak plantar pressure and contact area were analyzed using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis.

FINDINGS

In the ITT analysis, SFE significantly increased peak plantar pressure in the medial MTPJ (p = 0.016), hallux (p < 0.001), and second toe (p = 0.004), while reducing midfoot pressure (p = 0.0012). TCE significantly increased the heel pressure (p < 0.001). The PP analysis showed similar trends, with additional increases in the lateral MTPJ pressure (p = 0.032) and contact areas of the 3rd-5th toes (p = 0.008) in the SFE group.

INTERPRETATION

SFE increased the medial and lateral MTPJ, hallux, and toe pressure while reducing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 34 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free