Evidence Hub

268-OR: Perioperative Fully Closed-Loop vs. Standard Insulin Delivery in Adults Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery—A Two-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

Gabija Krutkyte, Arna Marie Catherine Goerg, Christian A. Grob, Guido Beldi, Anna Silvia Wenning, R. Hovorka, M. Wilińska, D. Herzig et al.

Diabetes, 2024

19 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Major abdominal surgery predisposes to hyperglycemia due to metabolic stress, inflammation, perioperative nutrition support and medication. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of fully closed-loop (FCL) versus usual care (UC) insulin delivery for glycemic management in major abdominal surgery patients.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial (NCT05392452) we compared perioperative use of the CamAPS HX FCL system (Dexcom G6, YspoPump, SC faster insulin aspart) with UC insulin treatment from admission until hospital discharge (max 20 days) at two tertiary hospitals in Switzerland. The primary endpoint was % time in sensor glucose target range (5.6-10.0mmol/L).

Results: Thirty-seven patients (FCL n=18, UC n=19, 27% female, mean±SD age 66±12 years, BMI 27.8±5.7 kg/m2, HbA1C 6.9±1.0 %) were analyzed. Mean±SD % time in target glucose range (5.6-10.0mmol/L) was 80.1±10.0 % with FCL vs 53.7±19.7 % with UC (p<0.001). Time in hypoglycemia (<3.9mM and <3.0mM) did not differ between groups. Total daily insulin dose was significantly higher in the FCL vs UC group (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Perioperative use of FCL insulin delivery in major abdominal surgery patients with complex medical needs results in significantly better glucose control compared to standard insulin therapy without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

G. Krutkyte: None. A. Goerg: None. C.A. Grob: None. G. Beldi: None. A. Wenning: None. R. Hovorka: Other Relationship; CamDiab. Research…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free