Evidence Hub

Effects of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring on body weight and glycemic variability in overweight individuals with impaired glucose tolerance or mild diabetes: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Seiji Nishikage, Yasushi Nakagawa, Yushi Hirota, Kai Yoshimura, Mariko Ueda, Akane Yamamoto, Tomofumi Takayoshi, A. Matsuoka et al.

Obesity Research and Clinical Practice, 2025

19 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of visualizing blood glucose variability by intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) on weight reduction in overweight individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or mild type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty overweight (BMI, ≥25 kg/m2) individuals with IGT or T2DM (drug naïve; HbA1c, ≤7.0 %) were included in this 24-week randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to the control group (diet and exercise therapy) or the isCGM group (diet and exercise therapy plus isCGM). The primary endpoint was the change in body weight during the 24-week intervention period.

RESULTS

One participant in the isCGM group withdrew consent. We therefore analyzed 19 individuals in the isCGM group and 20 in the control group. Baseline BMI was significantly higher in the isCGM group (35.2 ± 5.7 kg/m²) compared to the control group (31.6 ± 6.8 kg/m²). Weight change in the isCGM and control groups (-1.8 and -2.2 kg) did not differ. However, the change in coefficient of variation (-0.9 and 2.9 %) of sensor glucose differed significantly between the two groups. isCGM scan frequency was positively correlated with time above range (TAR) during the first month, positively correlated with the change in protein intake, and negatively correlated with that in TAR.

CONCLUSION

While isCGM use in overweight individuals with IGT or mild T2DM did not reduce body weight, it might have influence dietary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free