Evidence Hub

Feasibility of remotely delivered Tai Chi on older adults' 24-hour movement behaviors: A crossover randomized controlled trial

Yingying Chen, Suryeon Ryu, Nan Zeng, John Oginni, Ruth Taylor-Piliae, Zan Gao

Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 2026

44 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The feasibility of remotely delivered Tai Chi (TC) interventions and their potential influence on 24-h movement behaviors (physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep) to promote health is limited. Thus, this study tested the feasibility of a remote TC program among community-dwelling older adults and examined its preliminary effects on 24-h movement behavior outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A crossover randomized controlled trial enrolled 44 older adults assigned to either the AB sequence (12 weeks of remotely delivered TC followed by a 2-week washout and 12 weeks of usual care), or the BA sequence (the reverse order). Study feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention rates, whereas intervention feasibility included intervention adherence, fidelity, and acceptability. The 24-h movement behaviors were tracked by a wearable sensor.

RESULTS

Forty-one participants (mean age = 70.8 ± 5.6; 78% women) completed the study and were included in the data analysis. Recruitment and retention rates were 76% and 93%, respectively. Results showed that 85% of participants completed ≥18 of 24 TC sessions, and 94% reported the acceptability of TC as "good" or "excellent". The linear mixed-effects models using period-level change scores showed no statistically significant treatment effects for steps, sleep time, sedentary time, lightly active time, or active time.

CONCLUSION

The findings demonstrate that a remotely delivered TC program is feasible, acceptable…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free