Evidence Hub

Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improves Glycemic Control in the Early Postoperative Period Following Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

M. Protuš, Barbora Voglová Hagerf, A. Jabor, J. Franeková, Lenka Nemetova, E. Uchytilová, Veronika Indrova, Jana Beckova et al.

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2026

154 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early postoperative glycemic control after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) is challenging because of surgical stress, corticosteroid and calcineurin-inhibitor immunosuppression, and parenteral nutrition. We evaluated whether adding real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) to standard care increases time in the target glucose range.

METHODS

In this single-center randomized controlled trial, OLTx recipients were randomized after surgery to open (Active) or blinded (Control) rtCGM (Dexcom G6); in the Active group, sensor data guided insulin titration. The primary endpoint was time in target range (TIR, 6.0-10.0 mmol/L), analyzed in a modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included glycemic metrics, insulin requirements, and predefined clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

We randomized 154 patients; 142 with available data were analyzed (82 Active, 60 Control). The Active group spent more time in target range (68.9% vs. 60.8%; median difference 7.2 percentage points [95% CI: 2.7-12.0]; P = 0.003), with less time in Level 1 hyperglycemia (P = 0.025) and fewer extended hyperglycemic episodes (incidence rate ratio 1.65 [1.03-2.65] for Control vs. Active; P = 0.039). TIR improved similarly in patients with and without pretransplant diabetes; the only significant treatment-by-diabetes interaction was a greater reduction in Level 2 hyperglycemia among patients with diabetes (P < 0.001). Hypoglycemia was minimal in both groups. Infectious…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 154 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free