Evidence Hub

Expanding life's radius? Evaluating geolocation data of women with posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood abuse throughout a randomized controlled trial

Johanna Rehder, Marvin Guth, U. Ebner-Priemer, N. Kleindienst, Kathlen Priebe, M. Müller-Engelmann, Franziska Friedmann, Sophie Rausch et al.

Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, 2025

166 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Experiences of childhood abuse often relate to reduced physical and mental well-being in adulthood, affecting the everyday life behavior of people with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after childhood abuse. Passive sensing via digital sensors allows for examining manifestations of psychopathology, for example, restricted activity space, in daily life. However, there is a scarcity of research applying this method in therapy research. Building on previous cross-sectional findings showing restricted activity space in PTSD, we used global positioning system (GPS) tracking in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine how treatment effects of two treatment arms, dialectical behavior therapy for PTSD (DBT-PTSD) and cognitive processing therapy (CPT), map to changes in patients' daily lives throughout 12 months of outpatient psychotherapy. We examined the spatial and temporal activity spaces of women with PTSD (n = 166, Mage = 35.81, SDage = 10.98) at three timepoints over the course of 1 week each: pretreatment (t1RCT), 6 months into treatment (t3RCT), and at the end of the intensive treatment phase after 12 months (t5RCT). While both DBT-PTSD and CPT have demonstrated efficacy in treating PTSD with affective instability, with DBT-PTSD showing superiority over CPT, these effects did not transfer to the everyday life activity spaces captured via GPS tracking. Comparing t1RCT to t5RCT, linear mixed models revealed no effect of timepoint or treatment on movement radius and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 166 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free