Evidence Hub

Sharing digital self-monitoring data with others to enhance long-term weight loss: A randomized controlled trial

Nicole A. Miller, M. Ehmann, Charlotte J. Hagerman, E. Forman, D. Arigo, Bonnie Spring, E. LaFata, F. Zhang et al.

Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2023

12 citations

Abstract

Background: Participants in behavioral weight loss (BWL) programs increasingly use digital tools to self-monitor weight, physical activity, and dietary intake. Data collected with these tools can be systematically shared with other parties in ways that might support behavior change. Methods: Adults age 18 to 70 with overweight/obesity (BMI 27–50 kg/m2) will enroll in a remotely delivered, 24-month BWL program designed to produce and maintain a 10% weight loss. Participants will be asked to use a wireless body weight scale, wearable activity sensor, and dietary intake app daily. All participants will receive individual and group counseling, engage in text messaging with members of their group, and appoint a friend or family member to serve in a support role. A 2×2×2 factorial design will test the effects of three types of data sharing partnerships: 1) Coach Share: The behavioral coach will regularly view digital self-monitoring data and address data observations. 2) Group Share: Participants will view each other’s self-monitoring data in small-group text messages. 3) Friend/Family Share: A friend or family member will view the participant’s data via automated message. The primary outcome is weight loss at 24 months. Mediators and moderators of intervention effects will be tested. Conclusion: This study will provide a clear indication of whether data sharing can improve long-term weight loss. This study will be the first to discern the mechanisms of action through which each…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free