Evidence Hub

A randomized clinical trial for meal bolus decision using learning-based control in adults with type 2 diabetes

Wei Liu, Deheng Cai, Rui Zhang, Xiu-Ying Zhang, Xiao-Ling Cai, Liyuan Tao, Xue-Yao Han, Ying-Ying Luo et al.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2024

140 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We proposed an artificial-pancreas-like algorithm (AP-A) which could automatically determine the pre-prandial insulin dose based on intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) data trajectories in multiple dose injection (MDI) therapy. We aim to determine whether pre-prandial insulin dose adjustments guided by the AP-A is as effective and safe as physician decisions.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, single-blind, clinical trial at a tertiary, referral hospital in Beijing, China. Type 2 diabetes participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years, with a glycated hemoglobin of 8.0% or higher. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the AP-A arm supervised by physician and the conventional physician treatment arm. The primary objective was to compare percentage time spent with sensor glucose level in 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (TIR) between the two study arms. Safety was assessed by the percentage time spent with sensor glucose level below 3.0 mmol/L (TBR).

RESULTS

140 participants were screened, of whom 119 were randomly assigned to AP-A arm (n = 59) or physician arm (n = 60). The TIR achieved by the AP-A arm was statistically non-inferior compared with the control arm (72.4% (63.3-82.1) vs. 71.2% (54.9-81.4)), with a median difference of 1.33% (95% CI, -6.00 to 10.94, non-inferiority margin -7.5%). TBR was also statistically non-inferior between the AP-A and control arms (0.0% (0.0-0.0) vs. 0.0% (0.0-0.0), respectively; median difference…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 140 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free