Evidence Hub

Validation of a New Transcutaneous tcPO2/tcPCO2 Sensor with an Optical Oxygen Measurement in Preterm Neonates

van Weteringen W, van Essen T, Gangaram-Panday NH, Goos TG, de Jonge RCJ, Reiss IKM

Neonatology, 2020

112 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Traditional transcutaneous oxygen (tcPO2) measurements are affected by measurement drift, limiting accuracy and usability. The new potentially drift-free oxygen fluorescence quenching technique has been combined in a single sensor with conventional transcutaneous carbon dioxide (tcPCO2) monitoring. This study aimed to validate optical tcPO2 and conventional tcPCO2 against arterial blood gas samples in preterm neonates and determine measurement drift.

METHODS: In this prospective observational study, during regular care, transcutaneous measurements were paired to arterial blood gases from preterm neonates aged 24-31 weeks of gestational age (GA) with an arterial catheter. Samples were included based on stability criteria and stratified for sepsis status. Agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis. Measurement drift per hour was calculated.

RESULTS: Sixty-eight premature neonates were included {median (interquartile range [IQR]) GA of 26 4/7 [25 3/7-27 5/7] weeks}, resulting in 216 stable paired samples. Agreement of stable samples in neonates without sepsis (n = 38) and with suspected sepsis (n = 112) was acceptable for tcPO2 and good for tcPCO2. However, in stable samples of neonates with sepsis (n = 66), tcPO2 agreement (bias and 95% limits of agreement) was -32.6 (-97.0 to 31.8) mm Hg and tcPCO2 agreement was 4.2 (-10.5 to 18.9) mm Hg. The median (IQR) absolute drift values were 0.058 (0.0231-0.1013) mm Hg/h for tcPO2 and 0.30 (0.11-0.64) mm Hg/h…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 112 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free