Evidence Hub

Breath-based stratification of asthma severity using the MISTRAL platform with integrated H2S sensor and clinical validation

Germinario R, Andriani E, Tondo P, Soccio P, la Grasta A, Cafagna I, Lacedonia D, Dell'Olio F et al.

Scientific reports, 2025

28 participants

Abstract

Exhaled breath analysis offers a painless window into airway inflammation, yet its clinical adoption is limited by a shortage of robust biomarkers. Hydrogen sulfide ([Formula: see text]) has been detected in biological fluids, but its diagnostic value across asthma severities is not well established. In this study, we integrated an electrochemical [Formula: see text] sensor with a detection limit of 1 ppb into the MISTRAL platform. We evaluated exhaled [Formula: see text] in a prospective cohort of 28 adult asthmatic patients. Mean exhaled [Formula: see text] concentrations were significantly higher in individuals with mild-to-moderate asthma ([Formula: see text]) than in those with severe asthma ([Formula: see text]; one‑tailed t‑test [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). In early-stage disease, [Formula: see text] levels negatively correlated with maximal expiratory flow MEF[Formula: see text], with a similar trend for MEF[Formula: see text], whereas in severe asthma, positive but not fully statistically significant correlations emerged with FEV[Formula: see text]/FVC ratio, and vital capacity VC. These findings reveal a biphasic pattern: elevated [Formula: see text] may signify a compensatory antioxidant response that collapses as damage in the medium-to-peripheral airways progresses. The plug-and-play MISTRAL platform thus enables real-time, point-of-care assessment of exhaled [Formula: see text] as a promising, and complementary biomarker to FeNO and blood…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 28 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free