Evidence Hub

Wearable inertial sensor assessment of kinematic characteristics during unilateral jump landings in elite volleyball players with patellar tendinopathy: a cross-sectional study

Benjamin Ben Zaki, Gauthier Desmyttere, S. Perrey, Marc Julia, G. Dusfour

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2026

Abstract

Patellar tendinopathy (PT) is a prevalent overuse injury in jumping athletes such as volleyball players, with a prevalence reaching up to 45%. It is thought to result, at least in part, from repetitive landing impacts that overload the tendon due to altered neuromuscular control and inadequate force absorption by the muscle-tendon unit. Wearable inertial sensor assessment offers an objective and field-deployable approach to characterize landing kinematics in this population. This study aimed to identify kinematic characteristics and explore kinetic variables distinguishing symptomatic from asymptomatic players with patellar tendinopathy during unilateral vertical jumps.

This cross-sectional study included thirty elite male volleyball players who performed single-leg countermovement jumps and single-leg drop jumps. Ten players met predefined clinical criteria for symptomatic patellar tendinopathy, including a Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment–Patellar (VISA-P) score ≤ 80, pain during single-leg decline squatting, and pain localized to the patellar tendon using pain mapping. Kinematic data were collected using 8 wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs, 100 Hz), and kinetic data using force platforms (1000 Hz).

The PT group showed reduced knee flexion angles at initial contact, at peak, and at peak estimated vertical ground reaction force (eVGRF), predominantly during the drop jump (Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted

p

< 0.05; Hedges’ g = 0.82–1.60). At the ankle, dorsiflexion…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free