Evidence Hub

Sensor-Based Assessment of Quadriceps EMG-Amplitude-to-Torque Ratios at Different Knee Angles: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study

Zhao-Xiang Zhang, Małgorzata Tomicka, Xiao-Dan Guo, Ming-Mao Li, Marcin Krawczynski, Piotr Aschenbrenner, Adam Kawczyński

Italian National Conference on Sensors, 2026

Abstract

Surface electromyography (sEMG) normalized to mechanical output can describe electrical activation amplitude relative to torque, but such ratios should not be interpreted automatically as neuromuscular efficiency. This exploratory cross-sectional study compared quadriceps activation-to-torque ratios at 45° and 75° knee flexion and examined hypothesis-generating associations with countermovement jump (CMJ) outcomes. Seventeen participants performed two brief unilateral maximal isometric knee-extension trials at each angle. Wireless sEMG from the vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and rectus femoris (RF) and Biodex torque were acquired separately and manually matched by participant, knee angle, and test set. Ratios were calculated as Noraxon-exported mean EMG amplitude divided by Biodex average peak torque. Ratios were higher at 45° than at 75° for VL (mean difference = 0.74 μV/(N·m), BCa 95% CI: 0.34–1.34; Holm-adjusted p = 0.020), VM (0.52, 0.09–0.72; p = 0.009), and RF (0.69, 0.22–1.32; p = 0.028). Exploratory Spearman correlations with CMJ outcomes ranged from −0.38 to 0.32 and were nonsignificant after false-discovery-rate correction. The findings indicate protocol-specific, angle-dependent differences, whereas CMJ associations remain inconclusive and require larger, reliability-focused studies with synchronized acquisition and fully documented signal processing.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free