Evidence Hub

Differences in Muscle Inter-Phasic Coherence During Side Kick Techniques Among Male Sanda Athletes of Different Skill Levels Based on Sensor Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Liang Li, Tian-Ce Liu, Guixiang Wang

Italian National Conference on Sensors, 2026

18 participants

Abstract

Objective: to clarify differences in the intermuscular coherence of core muscles during side kicks among male Sanda athletes at varying skill levels, particularly in critical frequency bands; to reveal the association between neuromuscular coordination mechanisms and technical proficiency; and to provide methodological references for quantitative analysis of combat sports techniques. Methods: Thirty-six male Sanda athletes were divided into professional (n = 18) and amateur (n = 18) groups based on athletic ranking and training duration. Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from 15 core muscles and kinematic data were synchronously recorded using a wireless EMG system and a high-speed camera. Signal processing extracted root mean square amplitude (RMS) and integral EMG (iEMG). Muscle coordination was quantified via time-frequency coherence analysis across alpha (8–15 Hz), beta (15–30 Hz), and gamma (30–50 Hz) bands. Results: The professional group exhibited significantly higher RMS and iEMG values in most core muscles (e.g., rectus femoris RMS: 0.298 ± 0.072 vs. 0.214 ± 0.077 mV, p < 0.001). Regarding intermuscular coherence, the professional group demonstrated significantly superior coherence in the α, β, and γ bands for key muscle pairs, including upper limb–swing leg, support leg–swing leg, and upper limb–support leg. Notable differences were observed in pairs such as external oblique–rectus femoris (alpha band: 0.039 ± 0.012 vs. 0.032 ± 0.011, p < 0.01) and right…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free