Evidence Hub

Gait Parameters and Postoperative Pain Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using Wearable Motion Sensors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Ryo Yoshikawa, N. Kanzaki, Ryoma Matsuno, Wataru Saho, Ryoga Kashima, Risa Harada, Ryosuke Kuroda, Yoshitada Sakai

Cureus, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Objectives Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is increasingly performed to alleviate pain and improve function in patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. This study aimed to evaluate the gait characteristics of patients with TAA using a motion sensor-based system and to investigate the relationship between postoperative pain and gait parameters. Methods This cross-sectional study included patients at least three months post-TAA. The evaluated parameters included sex, age, postoperative period, and the dorsiflexion/plantarflexion range of motion (ROM) of the ankle. Gait analysis was performed using a six-axis inertial sensor attached to both shoes to measure stride speed, heel-strike angle, toe-off angle (TOA), pronation angle, foot progression angle, vertical height, swing width, and stride length normalized to height. Pain was assessed using the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q). Comparisons were made between the surgical and contralateral sides, and the correlations between pain scores and measured angles were examined. Results Thirty-eight patients (mean age: 76 ± 5 years) were evaluated. The surgical side demonstrated significantly lower TOA (48.9° vs. 59.0°) and plantarflexion ROM (35.5° vs. 49.6°) compared with the contralateral side (p < 0.001). Although the pain scores showed no correlation with ROM, TOA on the surgical side showed a positive correlation with pain scores (r = 0.379, p < 0.05). Conclusions The surgical side exhibited reduced…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free