Evidence Hub

Standardized Methods for Evaluating Physical and Eating Behaviors: The WEALTH Cross-Sectional Study Protocol

Gráinne Hayes, C. Buck, Greet Cardon, Richard Cimler, S. Elavsky, L. Fezeu K, Janas M. Harrington, J. Kühnová et al.

JMIR Research Protocols, 2024

627 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The accurate measurement of physical behaviors (PBs) and eating behaviors (EBs) is critical for designing, monitoring, and implementing public health guidelines and intervention strategies. The objective of the Wearable Sensor Assessment of Physical and Eating Behaviours (WEALTH) project was to develop standardized methods to identify daily PBs and EBs from wearable research- and consumer-grade sensors and evaluate the interaction and contexts of these behaviors. Objective The aim of this paper is to describe the study design and methods and report on the descriptive characteristics of the participants. Methods Within the framework of the WEALTH project, a cross-sectional study (spring 2023 to spring 2024) was completed in 5 European research centers in the Czech Republic, France, Germany, and Ireland. In each center, participants attended a research lab, completed an online questionnaire, and provided measures of anthropometry and handgrip strength. The participants were then fitted with 2 research-grade and 2 consumer-grade devices and participated in a standardized semistructured lab-based activity protocol. The latter was specifically designed to collect labeled data that simulated common PBs and EBs typical for a daily routine. Participants were then followed during a 9-day free-living data collection period, which combined the assessment of PB and EB via wearable devices and time-based, event-based, and self-initiated ecological momentary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 627 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free