Evidence Hub

The pH Levels of Sentinel Lymph Nodes and the Probability of Cancer Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients: a Cross-Sectional Study

Maryam Avatefi, Zohreh Miripour, Fereshte Abasvandi, Faeze Aghaei, Sepideh Mansouri, Seyyed Hossein Miraghaie, Parisa Hoseinpour, M. Akbari et al.

Archives of Breast Cancer, 2024

34 participants

Abstract

Background: Cancer cells in lymph nodes can undergo metabolic changes, producing acidic byproducts. Our previous experimental results demonstrated significant pH differences between involved and free lymph nodes (LNs), potentially attributed to the release of these acidic byproducts. However, the accuracy of frozen sections is influenced by pathologists' expertise and limited response time. To address these limitations, we developed a simple pH sensing method.

Methods: In this paper, we conduct a cross-sectional study on non-neoadjuvant breast cancer patients (n= 34) from Shohada Tjarish Hospital and Azar Surgical Clinic to check the agreement between the pH value of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and their pathologic score. To assess the pH assay's validity in detecting metastasized cancer cells in lymph nodes, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the sensor were calculated using Permanent pathology of LNs as the reference standard.

Results: Results showed that cancer SLNs had pH , while free LNs had pH > 8 (p-value <0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the data were 89% (95% CI (0.73-1.05)) and 82% (95% CI (0.64-1.00)), respectively.

Conclusion: Hence, in the absence of a frozen section, such a simple measurement may assist the surgeon in deciding whether to dissect a further number of LNs or not.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 34 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free