Evidence Hub

Is proprioception affected in those with persistent intra-articular temporomandibular disorders? A cross-sectional study exploring joint position sense and force sense of the jaw

Alana Dinsdale, Lucy C. Thomas, R. Forbes, J. Treleaven

Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 2023

30 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proprioception is an important component of normal jaw function, although to date it is unknown if and how proprioception is affected in those with intra-articular temporomandibular disorders (IA-TMDs). This challenges effective management of this subgroup.

OBJECTIVES

Determine whether differences in local joint position sense and force sense exist between individuals with IA-TMD and those without a jaw problem.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHOD

Sixty age and sex matched participants were recruited (n = 30 IA-TMD, n = 30 healthy controls). Temporomandibular joint position sense was tested to one target (50% of maximal mouth opening) using a ruler. Temporomandibular force sense was tested to two targets (50% and 70% of maximal molar pain-free bite force) using a bite sensor. Constant, absolute and variable errors were calculated for each outcome and compared between groups using p-values and 95% confidence intervals for effect size (d).

RESULTS

Significantly greater degrees of constant, absolute and variable error were seen for force sense testing at the 50% target (p 0.05). Despite this, all joint position sense and force sense measures demonstrated possible clinical significance (upper limits 95% CI d ≥ 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Force sense, particularly at lower levels, appears impaired in those with IA-TMD. Joint position sense and force sense at higher levels appear less affected, although may still be important to consider in the management of IA-TMD in some…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free