Evidence Hub

A Facile Ratiometric Electrochemical Sensor for In Vivo/On-line Repetitive Measurements of Cerebral Ascorbic Acid in Brain Microdiaysate

Yi-Min Jiang, Xia Xiao, Chenchen Li, Yu Luo, Shu Chen, Guoyue Shi, Kai Han, Hui Gu

Analytical Chemistry, 2020

56 citations

Abstract

The in vivo monitoring of ascorbic acid (AA) following physiological and pathological events is of great importance because AA plays a critical role in brain functions. The conventional electrochemical sensors (ECSs) usually suffered from poor se-lectivity and sluggish electron transfer kinetics for cerebral AA oxidation. To exploitation of ECSs adapt to the electrochem-ical detection (ECD)-microdialysis system, here we reported a facile ratiometric electrochemical sensor (RECS) for in vi-vo/on-line repetitive measurements of cerebral AA in brain microdiaysate. The sensor were constructed by careful electro-deposition of graphene oxide (GO) onto glassy carbon (GC) electrodes. Methylene blue (MB) was electrostatically adsorbed onto GO surface as a built-in reference to achieve ratiometric detection of AA. The subsequent proper electro-reduction treatment was able to readily facilitate the oxidation of AA at a relatively negative potential (-100 mV) and the oxidation of MB at separated potential (-428 mV). The in vitro experiments demonstrated that the RECS exhibited high sensitivity (de-tection limit: 10 nM), selectivity and stability towards AA determination, enabling in vivo/on-line repetitive measurement of cerebral AA in brain microdiaysate with high reliability. As a result, the designed RECS was successfully applied in the ECD-microdialysis system to in vivo/on-line repetitive monitoring the dynamic change of cerebral AA in the progress of the global cerebral ischemia…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free