Evidence Hub

Comparison of Complications in X-Ray Versus Ultrasound-Guided Hip Arthroscopy

Gordey E, Wong I

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 2022

460 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the complication rates and frequency of iatrogenic injury to the cartilage and labrum when using an ultrasound-guided hip arthroscopic technique compared with the standard x-ray-guided technique.

METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data, intraoperative videos were evaluated for iatrogenic injury during portal establishment. Postoperative complications and revision procedures were monitored for 12 months.

RESULTS: The study included 460 patients, with 38% in the ultrasound cohort. Video review showed a 2% complication rate of femoral head scuffing and <2% labral injury in both techniques, with no significant difference between techniques in cartilage injury (P = .90) or labrum puncture (P = .41). Six patients underwent revision procedures, 2 in the x-ray group and 6 in the ultrasound group. One patient developed a deep infection postoperatively. There were no other major complications.

CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided hip arthroscopy is a safe alternative to the standard x-ray-guided procedure in patients with a BMI less than 35.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 460 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free