Evidence Hub

Comparison Outcomes and Complications of Self-Propelled vs. Standard Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrojejunostomy (PEG-J); a Randomized Single Blind Clinical Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov · TERMINATED, 2014

19 participants

Abstract

Our main hypothesis is that self-propelled Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrojejunostomy tube (PEG-J) that has a balloon on it's tip is associated with lower J-tube retrograde migration rate, and lower rates of short- and long-term complications when compared to standard PEGJ feeding tubes.

Conditions: Feeding Tube.

Primary outcome: Number of Participants With PEG-J Tube Migration.

Enrollment: 19 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free