Evidence Hub

Assessment of the Results of Combined Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) + Antero Crusader Ligament (ACL) Plasty Compared to Classical KJ Plasty in Isolated ACL Ruptures

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2024

592 participants

Abstract

The aim of the study is to show a reduction of a re-rupture rate with an ACL (antero crusader ligament) + ALL (anterolateral ligament) combined technique compared to a classical Kenneth-Jones ACL (antero crusader ligament) reconstruction technique.

Conditions: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Ligament Rupture.

Primary outcome: Ligament re-rupture rate.

Enrollment: 592 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 592 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free