Evidence Hub

Sensitivity of chest X-ray from community screening: a meta-reanalysis of TB prevalence survey data

Burua A, Lukoye D, Kirenga B, Hermans S, Cobelens F

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUNDCommunity TB screening using chest X-ray (CXR) is recommended for high-burden settings. The sensitivity of CXR for community screening is regarded high but may be overestimated due to incorporation bias. We conducted a meta-reanalysis of data used to provide more accurate estimates for CXR sensitivity.METHODSWe considered 23 studies from a published systematic review and meta-analysis where participants were screened for TB using a combination of TB symptoms and CXR and received bacteriological sputum testing as the reference standard. We compared the sensitivity of CXR among symptom screen-positive study participants to that among all study participants.RESULTSTwenty-one studies were included for the meta-reanalysis. The pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval) of CXR among symptom screen-positive participants was 86% (83%-90%), lower than the pooled sensitivity based on all study participants (94% [92%-96%]) reported in the original meta-analysis. The pooled difference in sensitivity between the two approaches was 6% (4%-8%).CONCLUSIONThe sensitivity of CXR among symptomatic participants was lower than the published sensitivity, indicating incorporation bias. The sensitivity among symptomatic participants should be considered the realistic maximum sensitivity for community screening; the combined sensitivity for symptomatic and asymptomatic TB is likely lower..

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free