Evidence Hub

Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray screening for silicosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling study

Howlett P, Durairaj A, Lesosky M, Feary J

Occupational and environmental medicine, 2026

2,156 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Chest X-ray (CXR) is widely used for silicosis diagnosis, despite concerns regarding sensitivity. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of CXR for silicosis screening compared with CT, high-resolution CT (HRCT) and autopsy, and modelled the relationship between CXR sensitivity and disease severity.Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched on 2 July 2024 (PROSPERO registration: CRD42024513830). Meta-analyses were performed by reference standard and at increasing reference test severity cut-offs. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool assessed risk of bias. In scenarios of fixed and relative sensitivity, according to disease severity, we estimated missed silicosis cases and the number needed to screen (NNS) in hypothetical populations of low (5%), medium (15%) and high (30%) silicosis prevalence.Twenty studies included 2156 participants and 1105 silicosis cases. CXR had moderate sensitivity (0.76; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.86, I2=84%) and high specificity (0.89, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.95, I2=57%) compared with HRCT in 12 studies, and low sensitivity (0.50, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.55, I2=0%) and high specificity (0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.93, I2=20%) compared with autopsy in two studies. CXR sensitivity increased with higher reference test severity cut-offs. Clinically relevant numbers of cases were missed in fixed and relative sensitivity scenarios; increased prevalence and less severe disease resulted in more missed cases and a lower NNS.Silicosis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,156 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free