Evidence Hub

Creatine ingestion effects on oxidative stress in a steady-state test at 75% VO(2max)

Coco M, Perciavalle V

The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness, 2012

Abstract

AIM: The present study was carried out with the aim to analyze the role of creatine on oxidative stress during exercise, i.e. whether creatine is a pro-oxidative or an antioxidant substance.

METHODS: In a randomized double-blind study involving 30 adult males, we examined plasma lactate, oxidative stress markers (malondialdehyde, MDA) and glutathione redox ratio (GSSG·GSH-1), antioxidative systems (vitamins A, E, C), and ergospirometric responses (respiratory quotient and relative oxygen uptake) before and after 30 min steady-state tests 75% VO2max (placebo and creatine).

RESULTS: Ergospirometric tests, hematocrit values, blood lactate as well as vitamins A, E and C concentrations did not show significant differences between creatine and placebo testing. Conversely, oxidative stress markers MDA and GSSG·GSH-1 increased during placebo trials much more than in creatine trials.

CONCLUSION: This is the first report documenting that a creatine loading, i.e., a 0.3 g/kg/die of creatine ingestion for 5 consecutive days, could reduce the oxidative stress, whereas its consumption may not have a clear metabolic advantage in certain aerobic activities.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free