Evidence Hub

Effects of plyometric training and creatine supplementation on maximal-intensity exercise and endurance in female soccer players

Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, J. González-Jurado, Cristian Martínez, F. Nakamura, Luis Peñailillo, C. Meylan, A. Caniuqueo, R. Cañas-Jamet et al.

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2016

10 participants · 105 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of a six-week plyometric training and creatine supplementation intervention on maximal-intensity and endurance performance in female soccer players during in-season training.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

Young (age 22.9±2.5y) female players with similar training load and competitive background were assigned to a plyometric training group receiving placebo (PLACEBO, n=10), a plyometric training group receiving creatine supplementation (CREATINE, n=10) or a control group receiving placebo without following a plyometric program (CONTROL, n=10). Athletes were evaluated for jumping, maximal and repeated sprinting, endurance and change-of-direction speed performance before and after six weeks of training.

RESULTS

After intervention the CONTROL group did not change, whereas both plyometric training groups improved jumps (ES=0.25-0.49), sprint (ES=0.35-0.41), repeated sprinting (ES=0.48-0.55), endurance (ES=0.32-0.34) and change-of-direction speed performance (ES=0.46-0.55). However, the CREATINE group improved more in the jumps and repeated sprinting performance tests than the CONTROL and the PLACEBO groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adaptations to plyometric training may be enhanced with creatine supplementation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free