Evidence Hub

Difference in Central Fatigue During Two Ultra-endurance Practices: Running vs. Cycling

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2021

19 participants

Abstract

The mechanisms contributing to muscle fatigue in extreme long-duration exercise bouts are poorly understood. Ultra-endurance exercise is an excellent model for the study of adaptive responses to extreme loads and stress and it is an especially useful model for documenting the origins of central fatigue. This protocol will compare fatigue during and after ultra-endurance exercise bouts that result in moderate lower-limb tissue damage (i.e. cycling) or significant damage (i.e. running). The results of this protocol will allow us to further understanding of the reasons for major central fatigue, i.e. within the central nervous system, in ultra-endurance.

Conditions: Ultra-marathon Runners.

Primary outcome: Maximum level of voluntary activation of relative central fatigue.

Enrollment: 19 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free