Evidence Hub

The Effects of Made-To-Measure Compression Garments on Pressures Exerted on the Lower Limbs and Recovery From Muscle Damage in Rugby Players

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2017

48 participants

Abstract

Aims

* To compare the compression pressures exerted by made-to-measure compression garments (CG) with those from standard sized garments

* To assess the efficacy of custom fitted, high pressure CG for facilitating the recovery of strength, muscular power and sprint performance, and to compare the effects with those of garments exerting lower pressures and a sham treatment

Rationale for study design

The results of a recent meta-analysis (unpublished data) have informed the design of this study. The conclusions of the meta-analysis were that CG are most effective for the recovery of:

* Force and power performance following eccentric/plyometric exercise

* Maximal force production, at least 24 hours post-exercise (for example in strength and power athletes undertaking resistance training programmes)

* Additionally, the recovery of high-intensity cardiovascular performance may also be enhanced by the used of CG, when tested 24 hours following exercise which incurs metabolic stress Accordingly, the current study was designed to investigate the effects of CG on the recovery of force, muscular power and sprint performance in rugby players over a 48 hour period following damaging exercise. The exercise protocol chosen (detailed below) provided both mechanical and metabolic recovery demands.

Conditions: Muscle Damage.

Primary outcome: Change in lower body strength; Change in lower body jump performance; Change in sprint speed.

Enrollment: 48 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 48 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free