Evidence Hub

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of CellCept, Administered in a Sequential Treatment Scheme, in Delaying Progressive Renal Damage in Patients With Lupus Nephritis

ClinicalTrials.gov · TERMINATED, 2008

16 participants

Abstract

This study will compare the efficacy of CellCept \[0.5-2 grams per day (g/day) orally (p.o.)\] and cyclophosphamide \[0.5-1 grams per square meter (g/m2) quarterly\] as maintenance treatment for patients with lupus nephritis. All patients will receive induction treatment with cyclophosphamide (0.5-1g/m2 monthly) for 6 months, and will then be randomized to the maintenance phase of the study for a further 6 months, followed by 6 months of treatment-free follow-up. The anticipated time on study treatment is 12 months.

Conditions: Lupus Nephritis.

Primary outcome: Creatinine Clearance; Urinary Protein; Serum Creatinine; Serum Albumin.

Enrollment: 16 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free