Evidence Hub

A clinical trial of creatine in ALS

Jeremy M. Shefner, Merit Cudkowicz, David Schoenfeld, Thomas M. Conrad, J Taft, Mark Chilton, Leo Urbinelli, Muddasir Qureshi et al.

Neurology, 2004

104 participants · 294 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial dysfunction occurs early in the course of ALS, and the mitochondria may be an important site for therapeutic intervention. Creatine stabilizes the mitochondrial transition pore, and is important in mitochondrial ATP production. In a transgenic mouse model of ALS, administration of creatine prolongs survival and preserves motor function and motor neurons. METHODS: The authors conducted a randomized double-blind, placebo controlled trial on 104 patients with ALS from 14 sites to evaluate the efficacy of creatine supplementation in ALS. The primary outcome measure was maximum voluntary isometric contraction of eight upper extremity muscles, with secondary outcomes including grip strength, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, and motor unit number estimates. Patients were treated for 6 months, and evaluated monthly. RESULTS: Creatine was tolerated well, but no benefit of creatine could be demonstrated in any outcome measure. CI analysis showed that the study, although powered to detect a 50% or greater change in rate of decline of muscle strength, actually made an effect size of greater than 23% unlikely. It was also demonstrated that motor unit number estimation was performed with acceptable reproducibility and tolerability, and may be a useful outcome measure in future clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Any beneficial effect of creatine at 5 g per day in ALS must be small. Other agents should be considered in future studies of therapeutic agents to address…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 104 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free