Evidence Hub

Creatine Monohydrate in Adolescent Athletes: A Critical Narrative Review of Performance, Safety, and Responsible Use

Farfán-Díaz Á, Fuentes Hinojosa C, Andrade Oyarzun M, Garcia-Carrillo E, Molina-Márquez I, Yáñez-Sepúlveda R, Castillo-Paredes A, Barrera-González D et al.

2026

Abstract

Creatine monohydrate is among the most evidence-supported ergogenic aids in adults, but its use by adolescent athletes remains controversial because age-specific trials are sparse. This critical narrative review evaluated performance effects, safety, and conditions for responsible use in adolescent athletes. PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from 1992 through 19 June 2026, with reference-list screening. Direct sport-specific evidence remains limited, heterogeneous, short term, and predominantly male. Trials in soccer, swimming, basketball, weightlifting, and rehabilitation suggest possible improvements in power, repeated-sprint performance, jumping, selected technical outcomes, and recovery-related measures; however, small samples and narrow endpoints preclude conclusions about overall competitive performance. A 32-week uncontrolled cohort in female football players found no clinically meaningful biochemical safety signal, whereas a single high-dose loading case reported acute kidney injury; neither design can estimate causal risk. Controlled studies have not shown consistent clinically important adverse effects at studied doses, yet long-term safety, sex- and maturation-specific responses, and uncommon events remain insufficiently characterized. Creatine should therefore be neither routinely recommended nor categorically prohibited. Consideration should be restricted to mature, trained adolescents…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free