Evidence Hub

Anti-Signal Recognition Particle-Positive Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy with Acute Inpatient Myocarditis and Pharyngeal Involvement in a Young Adult: A Case Highlighting the Importance of Early Biologic Escalation – A Case Report

Zutshi B, Garg S, Bharti P, Kumar S, Kumar A, Chakraborty A, Mehra M, Bhutani B et al.

2026

Abstract

Abstract Background Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a rare and clinically severe subtype of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, characterised by predominant myofibre necrosis with a paucity of lymphocytic infiltration. Anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP)-positive IMNM represents a particularly aggressive disease phenotype, frequently resistant to corticosteroid monotherapy and complicated by extramuscular manifestations, of which cardiac involvement remains under-recognised. Case Presentation: We report a 26-year-old Indian woman who presented with a two-month history of symmetric, insidious-onset proximal limb weakness, one month of truncal weakness, and ten days of dysphagia. Investigations revealed markedly elevated creatine kinase (peak 7,112 IU/L), anti-SRP antibody positivity on a myositis-specific line-blot panel, concurrent strong positivity for anti-Ro52 and anti-SS-A antibodies without fulfilling criteria for Sjögren's syndrome, a myopathic electromyogram, and muscle biopsy findings of necrotising autoimmune myopathy. Concurrent corticosteroid and methotrexate therapy produced clinical deterioration. On the eighth inpatient day, probable immune-mediated myocarditis supervened, manifest as sinus bradycardia, anterior T-wave inversions, and a positive cardiac troponin T (cTnT) in the absence of wall-motion abnormality on echocardiography. Sequential immunosuppressive escalation encompassing pulse methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free