Evidence Hub

Circulating MicroRNAs and Their Associations with Neurotrophic, Inflammatory and Glutamate Markers in Healthy Volunteers

O’Shea A, Mason NL, Briede JJ, Schreiber R, Verheijen MC, Krauskopf J, Ramaekers JG

2026

62 participants

Abstract

Psilocybin acutely alters neurotrophic, neurochemical, and immune markers, but the relationships between these responses and circulating microRNAs (miRNAs), i.e. non-coding RNAs that regulate post-transcriptional gene expression, remain unclear. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 62 healthy adults who received psilocybin (0.17 mg/kg) or placebo, we previously demonstrated that let-7g-5p and miR-150-5p were transiently differentially expressed 360 minutes after psilocybin administration. Here, we examined whether changes in these miRNAs were associated with concurrent neurotrophic, inflammatory, pharmacokinetic, and glutamatergic measures. Expression changes from baseline to 360 min and 7 days were analysed using linear regression against changes in BDNF, TNF-α, IL-6, C-reactive protein, cortisol, medial prefrontal cortex glutamate/total creatine, and psilocin concentrations. Psilocybin increased let-7g-5p and decreased miR-150-5p expression. Changes in let-7g-5p were positively associated with psilocin concentrations, suggesting sensitivity to inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability, whereas miR-150-5p showed no concentration-dependent association. In both groups, miRNA changes were negatively related to baseline expression: lower baseline let-7g-5p predicted larger increases, whereas higher baseline miR-150-5p predicted larger decreases. BDNF changes were associated with both miRNAs under placebo but not psilocybin, consistent with reduced…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 62 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free