Evidence Hub

A Non-Invasive Urinary Bile-Acid Marker for Never-Smoker Lung Cancer

Chung S, Liu H, Khan M, Patel TS, Blackman B, Swenson RE, Pine SR, Gonzalez FJ et al.

2026

846 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer in never-smokers is a growing, biologically distinct entity lacking non-invasive markers. Established urinary markers—creatine riboside (CR) and N-acetylneuraminic acid (NANA)—report tumor-intrinsic metabolism, not carcinogen processing. We investigated 27-nor-5β-cholestane-3α,7α,12α,24R,25S-pentol glucuronide (CPG), a bile-acid glucuronide linked to aryl-hydrocarbon-receptor (AhR)/CYP xenobiotic metabolism.

Methods: Urinary CPG was quantified by UPLC–tandem mass spectrometry in an exploratory (NCI-Maryland; n=846) and validation (Colorado; n=505) cohort of non-small-cell lung cancer cases and frequency-matched controls. Associations with case status, smoking stratum, survival, and discrimination were assessed, using tumor RNA sequencing (n=83) and gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA).

Results: Urinary CPG was higher in cases than controls in both cohorts (P<0.0001). In never-smokers, cases exceeded smoking-matched controls (P<0.001 and P<0.0001), indicating elevation independent of tobacco exposure. After mutual adjustment for CR and NANA, CPG remained independently associated with case status (exploratory OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.15–2.16; validation OR 3.92, 95% CI 2.47– 6.29), with a modest gain in discrimination. High CPG identified never-smokers with worse survival in both cohorts (P<0.001 and P=0.04), remaining significant after multivariable adjustment only in the exploratory cohort. GSEA showed AhR/CYP xenobiotic and Nrf2 oxidative-stress enrichment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 846 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free