Evidence Hub

The urinary-metabolite-based lung cancer index (uLCI): an interpretable machine-learning risk model for early-stage disease

Khan MA, Pine SR, Gonzalez FJ, Wang XW, Harris CC, Patel DP

2026

1,333 participants

Abstract

Summary:

Background: Five-year survival from lung cancer exceeds 60% at stage I–II but falls below 10% once metastasis occurs. Low-dose CT (LDCT) screening reduces mortality in heavy smokers but carries a false-positive rate of approximately 29% and is restricted to smoking-based eligibility, leaving most cases undetected. We aimed to develop and independently validate an interpretable machine-learning urinary metabolite risk index (uLCI) for non-invasive lung cancer detection.

Methods: Four urinary metabolites—creatine riboside (CR), N-acetylneuraminic acid (NANA), 27-nor-5β-cholestane-3α,7α,12α,24 R ,25 S -pentol (CP), and cortisol sulfate (CS)—and three clinical variables (age, race, smoking) were integrated by Lasso-regularised logistic regression into a uLCI score. The model was developed under 10-fold cross-validation in the NCI-Maryland (NCI-MD) cohort (n=845; 470 controls, 375 cases, stages I–IV) and applied without refitting to the independent Colorado Lung Cancer Cohort (n=488; 211 controls, 277 cases). Analyses were prespecified; reporting followed TRIPOD+AI.

Findings: uLCI achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0·906 (95% CI 0·887–0·926) in NCI-MD and 0·748 (0·701–0·793) in the independent Colorado cohort. Scores rose monotonically across stages in both cohorts (Spearman ρ=0·69 and 0·45; both p<0·0001). Stage-specific discrimination was preserved from stage I to IV (NCI-MD 0·900–0·927; Colorado 0·722–0·843). Net reclassification improvement over clinical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,333 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free