Evidence Hub

Creatine Use Among Women Across Reported Duration-of-Use Groups: A Platform-Based Cross-Sectional Survey of Supplementation Behaviors, Motivations, Knowledge, and Experiences

Burridge J, Zhang Z, Boolani A, Ambrose C, Sodickson DK, Glenn JM

Nutrients, 2026

1,055 participants

Abstract

Background: Creatine is now discussed beyond sports performance and within women's health, cognition, fatigue, and healthy-aging contexts. However, little is known about the characteristics of women who use creatine or whether these characteristics differ across durations of use. This study characterized women reporting current or past-12-month creatine use in a large cross-sectional sample and benchmarked findings against men.

Methods: In a cross-sectional, supplement-platform convenience survey (approximately 2.0% response rate; a secondary analysis of a previously reported cohort), 2094 current or recent creatine users (1055 women, 1039 men; mean age 53 years [54.0 in women and 52.5 in men]) reported duration of use, supplementation goals, information sources, creatine knowledge alignment using a five-item battery, self-rated confidence, satisfaction, and intent to continue supplementation for another six months. Representation of women across six ordered duration bands was evaluated using an age-adjusted logistic model with duration as a categorical factor, with a Cochran-Armitage trend test reported alongside it. Among women, goals and information sources were compared across duration-of-use bands using unadjusted tests of homogeneity, and knowledge alignment was evaluated using an ordered trend test. Gender differences were estimated in age- and duration-adjusted models, pooled across duration groups, with Benjamini-Hochberg correction within domain; gender × duration…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,055 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free