Evidence Hub

Creatine formulations and repeated sprint training: effects on physical and physiological adaptations in soccer players during the short-term preparation phase

Duan C, Wang Z, Wang Q

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2026

10 participants

Abstract

Background: This research examined the impact of various creatine (Cr) supplementation formulations during a 4-week preparatory phase on the efficacy of repeated sprint training (RST) and on improvements in physical and physiological performance in male soccer athletes.

Methods: A total of forty collegiate young soccer players volunteered for the study. They were randomly divided into four groups: creatine monohydrate (Cr-Mon, n = 10), creatine ethyl ester (Cr-Ee, n = 10), creatine hydrochloride (Cr-Hcl, n = 10), and placebo (PL, n = 10). All athletes engaged in a 4-week training intervention, three times a week (i.e. 12 sessions), and physical (countermovement vertical jump [CMVJ], 20-m sprint, and L-run) and physiological (Wingate anaerobic power and incremental exercise tests) performance were assessed both before and after the training period.

Results: All training groups improved physical and physiological performance following the 4-week intervention period (p p = 0.001) in physical performance, peak power output, and fatigue index compared to the PL group. However, no significant differences were found among the groups regarding mean power output and VO2max. Notably, the Ee and Hcl forms of Cr showed superior gains (p < 0.05) in physical performance and peak power compared to the Mon form after the 4-week intervention.

Conclusions: The results underscore the importance of Cr ingestion in enhancing adaptations for short-term physical performance tasks, highlighting the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free