Evidence Hub

Identification and Validation of Candidate Biomarkers Co-expressed with Creatine Metabolism-Related Genes in Ischemic Stroke Based on Transcriptomics Data

Li J, Feng X, Liu C, Song Y, Liu X, Sun J

Molecular neurobiology, 2026

Abstract

Ischemic stroke (IS) is a major cause of death and disability, and creatine metabolism (CM) is potentially involved in its development. This study examined IS candidate biomarkers co-expressed with CM-related genes (CMRGs). IS data and CMRGs were sourced from public databases and published research. We identified candidate genes by intersecting genes from weighted co-expression network analysis and differential expression analysis. Candidate biomarkers were selected via machine learning. A diagnostic nomogram was constructed, and functional roles were explored via enrichment and immune infiltration analyses. Candidate biomarker expression was preliminarily validated by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction in a small clinical cohort. Intersection analysis of the 336 differentially expressed genes and 3914 module genes yielded 111 candidate genes. Subsequently, F12 and PLXDC2 were identified as candidate biomarkers, and these genes were upregulated in IS samples. The nomogram based on these candidate biomarkers showed promising capacity for differentiating sample types in the training set, warranting further evaluation in independent cohorts. In addition to enrichment in pathways such as oxidative phosphorylation, VEGF-VEGFR2 signaling, and interleukin signaling, F12 and PLXDC2 were also strongly and positively correlated with neutrophils (r > 0.30, P < 0.001). Further screening highlighted cyclosporin A and trichostatin A as drugs that could…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free