Evidence Hub

Acute Responses to Creatine Monohydrate and L-Arginine, Alone and Combined, on Repeated-Sprint Power, Countermovement Jump Height, and Stroop Reaction Time in Recreationally Active Men: A Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Trial

Eken Ö, Uçar H, Kurtoğlu A, Ozan M, Buzdağlı Y, Söyler M, Aldhahi MI

Metabolites, 2026

18 participants

Abstract

Background/objectives: Creatine monohydrate (CR) and L-arginine (LA) are widely used ergogenic supplements, but whether acute co-ingestion provides additional performance or task-specific cognitive benefits beyond either supplement alone remains uncertain. This study compared placebo, CR, LA, and LA+CR on repeated-sprint power, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, and Stroop reaction time (RT).

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, four-period crossover trial, 18 recreationally active men completed placebo (CG), CR (0.3 g·kg-1), LA (6 g), and LA+CR conditions separated by at least 72 h (prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07548541). Testing began 60 min after ingestion with the Stroop test, followed by CMJ and the Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST). Co-primary outcomes were RAST average power (AP), peak power (PP), CMJ height, and incongruent Stroop median RT.

Results: Condition effects were observed for AP, PP, minimum power, CMJ height, and Stroop RT (all p ≤ 0.011), but not fatigue index or Stroop accuracy. All four co-primary omnibus effects remained significant after Holm correction (all pHolm p p = 0.002), and CR (MD 46.71 W; p p p p = 0.041), but not LA (p = 0.271). For AP, LA+CR exceeded CG and CR, but not LA after Bonferroni adjustment. In a secondary 2 × 2 factorial decomposition, no LA×CR interaction for a co-primary outcome survived Holm correction (all pHolm ≥ 0.104).

Conclusions: Acute LA+CR produced outcome-specific improvements in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free