Evidence Hub

Feasibility, safety and tolerability of intradialytic creatine supplementation in hemodialysis: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study

Doorenbos CSE, van der Veen Y, Post A, Jonker J, Knobbe TJ, Kremer D, Groothof D, Heiner-Fokkema MR et al.

PloS one, 2026

16 participants

Abstract

Background: Patients receiving hemodialysis are at risk of creatine deficiency due to impaired endogenous synthesis and losses during dialysis. Creatine deficiency is associated with lower health-related quality of life and higher mortality. We investigated the feasibility, tolerability and safety of intradialytic creatine supplementation during hemodialysis.

Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05148208), 16 hemodialysis patients were included into four sequentially initiated groups, with each group receiving a fixed creatine concentration in the dialysate (0.5 mmol/L, 1.0 mmol/L, 1.5 mmol/L and 2.0 mmol/L, respectively), with block randomization in a 3:1 ratio (creatine:placebo) per group. Dropouts were replaced. Intra-dialytic creatine was administered during a 6-week period. Primary outcomes were changes in pre-dialytic intra-erythrocytic and plasma creatine concentrations, which were analyzed with linear mixed models.

Results: 16 hemodialysis patients (aged 27-78 years, 9 female) completed the study. Creatine supplementation was generally well tolerated. One patient receiving 1.5 mmol/L creatine dropped out due to a potential side effect. No serious adverse events occurred. The median (minimum-maximum) baseline pre-dialytic intra-erythrocytic and plasma creatine concentrations were 963 (407-1822) and 35 (13-287) µmol/L, respectively. At 6 weeks, the changes in pre-dialytic intra-erythrocytic creatine…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free