Evidence Hub

The Impact of Cold-Water Immersion on Post-Match Recovery in Trained Soccer Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Veen J, Bergh C, Cao Y, Randers MB, Krustrup P, Edholm P

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026

3 citations

Abstract

Cold-water immersion (CWI) is widely used by elite soccer players to enhance recovery after match play, yet systematic evidence supporting the effectiveness of this intervention is lacking. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of CWI on the recovery of physical performance, muscle damage, and delayed muscle soreness in trained soccer players after match play. A systematic database search was conducted and inclusion criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed, controlled trials; (2) competitive soccer players; (3) comparison of CWI with control/placebo after match/simulated match-play; (4) at least one of the following outcomes: 20 m sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ), leg strength via maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), creatine kinase (CK) for muscle damage, or delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS); and (5) outcome measurements taken 24, 48 or 72 h post-match. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals (PI). Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. CWI significantly improved recovery of MVC (SMD = 1.02 [95% CI: 0.55 to 1.50; 95% PI: -0.48 to 2.53]) and CMJ (SMD = 0.38 [95% CI: 0.12 to 0.64; 95% PI: -0.39 to 1.15]), while sprint performance remained unaffected (SMD = -0.59 [95% CI: -1.41 to 0.23; 95% PI: -4.14 to 2.95]). CWI reduced CK levels (SMD = -0.77 [95% CI: -1.17 to -0.37; 95% PI: -2.23 to 0.69]) and alleviated DOMS (SMD = -1.04 [95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free