Evidence Hub

Risk factors for mortality in anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yang Y, Li Y, Yuan W, Zhang S, He X, Ji J

Frontiers in immunology, 2025

1,153 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis with interstitial lung disease (MDA5+ DM-ILD) carries a high mortality risk. This meta-analysis aimed to identify mortality risk factors to guide early clinical intervention.

METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published before November 18, 2024. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for mortality risk factors. Heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias were assessed using Cochran's Q, one-by-one elimination, and Egger's tests, respectively.

RESULTS: Among 1,153 patients from 15 studies, significant risk factors for mortality included older age (HR = 1.04, 95%CI: 1.03, 1.05), smoking (HR = 1.62, 95%CI: 1.06, 2.47), fever (HR = 2.56, 95%CI: 1.66, 3.95), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (HR = 1.02, 95%CI: 1.01, 1.02), rapidly progressive ILD (RP-ILD) (HR = 4.02, 95%CI: 1.89, 8.55), high white blood cell count (WBC) (HR = 1.11, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.21), Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) (HR = 1.11, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.16), ferritin (≥800 ng/mL) (HR = 6.17, 95%CI: 2.51, 15.20), and lymphocyte count (<1.1×109/L) (HR = 4.88, 95%CI: 1.80, 13.20). Higher PaO2 reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.86, 0.98). Male, creatine kinase (CK), percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lung carbon monoxide (DLCO%), percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,153 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free