Evidence Hub

The Protective Effect of Puerarin on Myocardial Infarction Reperfusion Injury (MIRI): A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies in Rat Models

Wenjun H, Jing W, Tao L, Ling M, Yan Y, Xiaorong Z, Rui Z

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2015

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although puerarin is generally considered as a protective agent for cardio-cerebrovascular diseases, the exact effect on reducing myocardial infarction reperfusion injury (MIRI) is not well understood. This study aimed to pool previous randomized controlled studies based on rat models to evaluate the effects of puerarin on MIRI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Relevant studies were searched among PubMed, Embase, Medline, and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure). To assess the therapeutic effects of protective effects of puerarin on myocardial infarction reperfusion injury, the outcome indicators which were reported in at least 3 original studies were extracted and pooled, including size of myocardial ischemia (MIS) and myocardial infarction (MIN), creatine kinase (CK), methylene dioxyamphetamine (MDA), and superoxide dismutase (SOD).

RESULTS: Administration of puerarin could effectively reduce the size of MIN after MIR (mean difference: -29.20, 95%CI: -44.90 to -13.51, p=0.0003). Puerarin directly led to decreased CK (mean difference: -6.89, 95%CI: -9.40 to -4.38, p=0.00001) and MDA (mean difference: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.14 to -1.68, p<0.00001) and increased serum SOD (mean difference: 63.97, 95%CI: 38.19 to 89.75, p<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS: Puerarin might have a protective effect in myocardial tissues during MIRI through increasing SOD and decreasing CK and MDA. However, more animal studies and randomized controlled clinical trials are required to confirm these…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free